Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Leander Winden's avatar

I think with How to Do Nothing, the point Jenny Odell makes is that capitalism is the context in which people feel obliged to always be doing things for some future benefit. Her suggestion, that it is okay to do nothing, is inherently opposed to that capitalist context. It's not that the goal is to resist capitalism - she leaves that to other books - she is just inviting people to remember that that sense of urgency, of obligation, comes from outside, and it would be wise to consider other ways of being in the world.

Expand full comment
Ryan's avatar

Its funny that many a weekend I feel insecure about responding what I accomplished over the weekend. It seems that, in my professional milieu, the expectation is renovations, building something, taking a course of study on the side, etc. when my answer is often instead that i drank tea, read a book, went on a hike, and hung out with a friend/pet.

Maybe to be fair to Jenny Odell, enjoying live for intrinsic rather than instrumental purposes can be a rebellion without intent, but I do agree if the intent presupposes the action (or lack thereof), then it is instrumentalized and therefore less pleasureful.

Is this a paradox of hedonism? in hedonism, all pleasure is instrumentally of moral value. Therefore is it best to be a virtue ethicist or deontologists that happens to align with hedonism but without that explicit goal?

Again similarly, the focus on an identity of a true self is its own narrative, quite in conflict of the daoist dudism of the dude.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts